Still, there is by no means unanimity among scholars on the subject, some favoring yet other pronunciations, such as “Yahuwa,” “Yahuah,” or “Yehuah.” Since certainty of pronunciation is not now attainable, there seems to be no reason for abandoning in English the well-known form “Jehovah” in favor of some other suggested pronunciation.
If such a change were made, then, to be consistent, changes should be made in the spelling and pronunciation of a host of other names found in the Scriptures: Jeremiah would be changed to (as in Greek).
’” (7:5 states that a blasphemer was not guilty ‘unless he pronounced the Name,’ and that in a trial involving a charge of blasphemy a substitute name was used until all the evidence had been heard; then the chief witness was asked privately to ‘say expressly what he had heard,’ presumably employing the divine name.
10:1, in listing those “that have no share in the world to come,” states: “Abba Saul says: Also he that pronounces the Name with its proper letters.” Yet, despite these negative views, one also finds in the first section of the Mishnah the positive injunction that “a man should salute his fellow with [the use of] the Name [of God],” the example of Boaz (Ru 2:4) then being cited.—9:5.
The Hebrew consonants of the name are therefore known.
The question is, Which vowels are to be combined with those consonants?
Some claim that it began following the Babylonian exile (607-537 B. Malachi, for example, was evidently one of the last books of the Hebrew Scriptures written (in the latter half of the fifth century B. E.), and it gives great prominence to the divine name. Evidence for this date supposedly was found in the absence of the Tetragrammaton (or a transliteration of it) in the Greek (God) for the Tetragrammaton. The lapse of time which may have served to obscure or distort memories of times so different; the political upheavals, changes, and confusions brought about by two rebellions and two Roman conquests; the standards esteemed by the Pharisean party (whose opinions the Mishnah records) which were not those of the Sadducean party . .—these are factors which need to be given due weight in estimating the character of the Mishnah’s statements.
Many reference works have suggested that the name ceased to be used by about 300 B. But these major manuscripts date back only as far as the fourth and fifth centuries C. More ancient copies, though in fragmentary form, have been discovered that prove that the of Deuteronomy, listed as P. Moreover there is much in the contents of the Mishnah that moves in an atmosphere of academic discussion pursued for its own sake, with (so it would appear) little pretence at recording historical usage.” (translated by H. xiv, xv) Some of the Mishnaic traditions concerning the pronouncing of the divine name are as follows: In connection with the annual Day of Atonement, Danby’s translation of the Mishnah states: “And when the priests and the people which stood in the Temple Court heard the Expressed Name come forth from the mouth of the High Priest, they used to kneel and bow themselves and fall down on their faces and say, ‘Blessed be the name of the glory of his kingdom for ever and ever!
He speaks of the living God, but never of the living Jehovah, for he cannot conceive of Jehovah as other than living.”—Edited by P. Paul’s reference to “God the Father” does not mean that the true God’s name is “Father,” for the designation “father” applies as well to every human male parent and describes men in other relationships.
(Ro , 16; 1Co ) The Messiah is given the title “Eternal Father.” (Isa 9:6) Jesus called Satan the “father” of certain murderous opposers.
(Joh ) The term was also applied to gods of the nations, the Greek god Zeus being represented as the great father god in Homeric poetry.
This is seen from the fact that when vowel pointing came into use in the second half of the first millennium C.
E., the Jewish copyists inserted the vowel points for either In the second half of the first millennium C.